Help Center

How can we help you?

Frequently asked questions

Browse by topic

About the Department of Justice’s Proposal on 100% Licensing

Why is the DOJ reviewing the ASCAP consent decree?
In 2014, at the urging of ASCAP and BMI, the Department of Justice (DOJ) announced that it would open a review of the ASCAP and BMI consent decrees—the outdated regulations that govern the operations of the nation’s two largest PROs. The consent decrees were originally written in 1941 and haven’t been updated since the invention of the iPod.
What has the DOJ proposed?

After a formal review process that’s taken more than two years, the DOJ recently informed songwriters that at this time it will not consider our requests to modernize and update the consent decrees.

Instead, the DOJ has proposed new requirements that would force ASCAP and BMI to license all songs in their respective repertoires on a 100% basis, ending the long-standing industry practice of fractional share licensing. This is regardless of the percentage actually owned by ASCAP’s writer and publisher members and BMI’s affiliates.

We are deeply disappointed by the DOJ’s proposal – especially given that thousands of ASCAP members wrote to the DOJ expressing serious concerns about 100% licensing and how it would impact songwriters' livelihoods and creative freedom. In addition to ASCAP’s letter to the DOJ making the argument against 100% licensing, the US Copyright Office and numerous members of Congress voiced their opposition as well.

Where does ASCAP stand on the DOJ’s 100% licensing, or “full work” licensing, proposal?
We believe the DOJ’s proposed 100% licensing requirement could be incredibly disruptive to the music marketplace, creating confusion, chaos and instability, potentially harming songwriters, increasing costs, complicating payments and stifling innovation and creative collaboration.
What kind of consent decree reforms did songwriters propose?
ASCAP welcomed this review, advocating for reforms to the consent decrees that would improve the ability of songwriters to get fair market value for the use of their work and preserve the value of collective licensing that enables PROs to serve its songwriter members. To that end, ASCAP advocated for the consent decrees to 1) allow for partial withdrawal for publishers; 2) allow the PROs to bundle multiple rights together for licensing; and 3) provide opportunities to expedite the rate setting process between PROs and licensees.
What are the next steps in this process, and what is ASCAP doing in response?

The DOJ is expected to announce their final decisions publicly by the end of July, but this is not the final outcome of this process.

ASCAP is still carefully considering all of our options, including potential legislative and legal remedies. We are also working closely with the entire songwriting and publishing community to work toward the best path forward.

It’s important to emphasize that we’ve also planned ahead for the possibility that such an ill-advised proposal could be enforced. Under the leadership of our new management team and with the support of our writer-publisher Board, ASCAP has made strategic investments in modernizing our operations and our systems in ways that will enable us to continue to lead and deliver results for our members, no matter what the future looks like.

How does this affect my relationship with ASCAP?

We want to reassure you that this in no way changes your ASCAP membership or ASCAP's commitment to protect, support and advocate for you and the value of your musical compositions. We know that you may have questions and concerns and we hope to have more answers and clarity to share in the coming weeks as we work through this process with the DOJ.

As the only member-owned and run performing rights organization in the US, we are deeply committed to ensuring the health of our community – our songwriter, composer and publisher members. You are the heart and soul of ASCAP and the very foundation of the music industry. As ASCAP has always done, we will keep fighting to preserve your rights.

How can I get involved and help ASCAP in this matter?
Thousands of our members have been involved by submitting public comments to the DOJ in support of our requested consent decree modifications, signing a petition to the DOJ opposing 100% licensing, advocating with ASCAP on Capitol Hill, writing your members of Congress about copyright reform, writing OpEds in the press and speaking out on our issues. That work will not stop. We will be reaching out to you to get involved in specific actions in the months to come and we hope you will stand with songwriters and stand with ASCAP.

Still need help? Contact us. 

(We're music people. We're good at listening.)

Latest News

Matthew Browne Receives ASCAP Foundation Nissim Prize For "Cabinet Of Curiosities"

Dr. Rudolf Nissim, former head of ASCAP's International Department and a devoted friend of contemporary composers, established this annual prize through a bequest to The ASCAP Foundation.

Sundance ASCAP Music Café Presents Michael Franti, Rooney, Clare Bowen, Josh Kelley, Andy Shauf and More at 2017 Sundance Film Festival

The 19th annual Sundance ASCAP Music Café – running during the daytime from January 20-27 – presents a vibrant lineup of renowned and up-and-coming artists and songwriters, specially curated by ASCAP for the Sundance Film Festival.

The Wallis, ASCAP and DreamWorks Animation Announce Original Musical Selections for The 2017 ASCAP Foundation Musical Theatre Workshop, in Partnership with DreamWorks Animation and The Wallis

The two-day annual workshop gives select composers and lyricists the opportunity to present songs and excerpts of new original musical works in progress for professional critique.