Articles & Advice
Being sure that a label is the right place for you;
what will be expected
of you after you sign;
different breeds of A&R people;
how to spot the
sharks;
more unpleasant surprises that can arise after you sign.
|
JEM: Brian, didn't you pass on a band
because their live show wasn't together?
BRIAN: That was Belle And Sebastian,
and that wasn't the only reason. That same scout in
London turned us on to them. They write really classic,
literary songs, which traditionally doesn't mean much
in this day and age. I saw them in London and they were
really shambolic -- the songs were still great, but
there was no way they wanted to play the game that major
labels would desire them to play, because they wouldn't
even have their picture taken -- actually they just
had their first picture in one of the British papers
a couple of weeks ago. They weren't that interested
in being a great band, they were really just interested
in writing great songs.
JIM: And that brings up a really
good point: everyone wants something different out of
their lives or their band or their musical career. Sometimes
those things fit really well with what major labels
do, sometimes they fit with what independent labels
want to do, and sometimes they don't. You have to be
very open about what you want, and everyone needs to
be on the same page when you're creating a working relationship,
because obviously things are going to change as you
go along. But you need to know the level of commitment
from both sides.
BRIAN: Signing to a label does not
mean you're just giving up your day job -- and often
you won't even do that -- but you're probably going
to be working harder than you ever have in your whole
life, and a lot of that work won't be musical. Especially
if your record is well-received.
JEM: Well, then it becomes a whole
other game. I've dealt with so many bands who demanded
attention, and then didn't want to do the things you'd
set up for them: they'd blow off interviews and photo
shoots and just not make much of an effort. I mean,
having dinner with a bunch of jaded rock writers or
radio guys can be a miserable social experience, but
the objective is to get those people to help. How well
you can do that determines whether or not your label
thinks that you "get it," and how hard they'll
work to get those interviews and meet-and-greets and
radio visits for you -- unless a really nasty image
is part your appeal, or if your record is so great that
you can afford to act like a jerk. I've seen a lot of
opportunities missed because an artist has already been
so difficult that the company doesn't want to risk its
reputation and its relationships -- they'll use those
opportunities on someone they know will take advantage
of them. But all of that stuff is hard work, and you
have to want it really badly to put up with it.
JIM: And there's nothing wrong with
not wanting to do that, but if you don't, you don't
want to get yourself in a situation where you're expected
to. It's really hard to make it in the music world under
any circumstances, and you have to be sure you've got
the right sort of company to get where you both want
to go.
You can usually see from an artist's work ethic what
they want, and how hard they're willing to work. There's
a big difference between some band from LA who's just
played their third show ever -- and suddenly they're
in Hits magazine and some hot lawyer is shopping
their tape and they want a million dollars and they've
got one great song and the rest of it's terrible --
and some band in St. Louis who are busting their asses,
getting some play on local radio, selling their own
CDs and merchandise, and pulling in a good crowd. There
are some people who will play music for the rest of
their lives -- even if they never get a record deal
-- and there are some who just want to become stars
overnight. Both types of people can become very successful,
and both can fail.
I don't think
you should sign with a major label if you don't
want to be a star, because they'll usually try
everything they can to make you one. ...JOSH
|
JOSH: I don't think you should sign
with a major label if you don't want to be a star, because
they'll usually try everything they can to make you
one -- especially now, because there's so much pressure
to sell a million records right away no matter what
kind of record it is.
BRIAN: I disagree. I think record
companies do make deals with artists that are in relation
to their sales expectations, but that's one of the things
that a bidding frenzy blows out of the water. But if
a label is into an artist early enough and they don't
see it as something that will break right away, that
deal will be made for much less money, which is a lot
smarter.
JEM: A band also has to be realistic.
A lot of indie bands said they'd never sign with a major
until they realized that the more they said they wouldn't,
the more money they'd make when they finally did.
JIM: Yep, and then they'd sign a
big deal with a major but try to keep that indie attitude,
and they'd end up making a super-credible indie album
that might sell as much as their last indie album, but
a major label isn't going to be happy with that. So
then the label's relationship with the band gets weird,
and the band wants to stick by their guns and say, "We're
going to BEAT this system and we'll be the ones that
change things!" Well, there's no beating that system
without selling tons of records first, so the band gets
dropped, and two weeks later, they break up. I mean,
what were they doing this for?
| ...a lot of artists
still think of "getting signed" as an
end in itself -- it's just another beginning.
...JEM |
JEM:I think a lot of artists still
think of "getting signed" as an end in itself
-- it's just another beginning, and there are a lot
of bands whose major label albums sold a lot less than
their indie albums.
BRIAN: Some of the fault can be placed
on the A&R executives and others from the record
companies who were trying to sign those bands. Because
most of the people doing A&R then did not come from
the punk rock/indie world. They glommed onto it when
they saw it as a market, and then just told the bands
what they wanted to hear: they gave lip service to artist
development, they wore what the indie kids were wearing,
and tried to appear like they were one of them -- and
frankly, they weren't. If you're in a band and A&R
people start talking to you, ask them serious questions
-- make them squirm! Seriously -- you'll be able to
tell pretty quickly if you've got a used-car salesman
trying to sign you, or someone who genuinely understands
you.
JIM: Even if that person doesn't
genuinely understand you, but is willing to admit that,
and learn and listen -- there are definitely different
kinds of A&R people. But you can figure that out.
It's not like that person needs to know every single
thing about how to market your band right away, they
just have to be willing to listen and figure out a way
to take what you're doing and try to parlay it into
something on a much larger scale.
JEM: Do you see indie-derived A&R
people paying lip service to electronic acts?
BRIAN: There are a lot of people doing
A&R now who have come out of the indie world, and
now find themselves in the pop world. And there are
actually more A&R people I know who admit ignorance
and also a lack of passion for electronic music, so
they don't try to play that game. Of course, there are
people who do feign interest and do fake it. That kind
of comes naturally to a certain breed of people who
do this job -- to always fake it and always readapt
oneself to the times. Most of the people who do that
end up with the worst reputations in the business.
JEM: Yes, but a nice word for that
type is "chameleon." What's the best way for
a band to spot someone like that?
| And do your homework
on the label -- ask them why certain bands were
dropped and why some were successful. ...BRIAN
|
BRIAN:It depends on what kind of
band they are, but one way is to learn about the background
of that A&R person -- find out what bands they've
signed, what companies they've worked for, what bands
they've worked with if they haven't signed things themselves,
and basically what their world-view is. And do your
homework on the label -- ask them why certain bands
were dropped and why some were successful.
JOSH: There's always some risk involved
-- you never really know what you're getting into. Even
if the A&R person is the greatest person in the
world and has the ear of the president, it still doesn't
mean it will succeed for sure. Nothing does!
JEM: The reality of that is that
a record company's promotion department can only work
so many records at once: commercial radio and MTV, for
their own reasons, only have so many slots, and which
records get a shot at those slots is usually decided
by the president of the company. When a label puts out
75 records in a quarter, they're competing against their
own records as well as everyone else's.
JOSH: But they don't care, because
they throw them all against the wall and WHACK -- those
three stuck!
BRIAN: And that one stuck for six
million copies and paid for all the ones that didn't
make it. It really hurts the A&R people at that
company, because how can they honestly say -- even if
they've been told that the company is really behind
it -- how do they know that it's actually going to happen?
JIM: It's beyond the A&R person.
I had that experience at a label I used to work for.
At one point, there were so many records coming out
that it went to the president of the company to say,
"We're working this record and that record and
until we get those two records, nothing else is getting
a slot at alternative radio."
JEM: How long did that go on?
JIM: A whole summer! A lot of records
didn't get the attention they deserved. And that happens
when any label puts out too many records of the same
genre at once -- you might lose records that should
or could be really big.
JEM: I've heard people say that
the "next big thing" is signed to a major
and is just languishing on a roster, being completely
ignored.
BRIAN: That's easy, journalistic,
a**-backward logic. [laughter]
JOSH: It's true, it is easy to say
that, but I don't think there is going to be an artist
that's going to change it -- there'll be artists that
mean something, but I just think it's so hard to have
a career and just be an artist now --
JEM: Couldn't you have said those
exact words just before Nirvana broke big?
JOSH: No, because that was an untapped
thing. I'm not giving up and saying there's nothing
else left; I just don't know if it's possible for something
to take over the public in such a huge way.
| Also, careers
are not all about being on major labels...BRIAN |
BRIAN: Also, careers are not all
about being on major labels -- that's one thing that
a lot of people overlook. There are a lot of smaller
labels like Touch&Go or Rykodisc that an artist
can succeed on -- and a lot of artists that major labels
failed with -- because the expectations aren't as high.
JIM: Sometimes you can make a lot
more money selling fewer records on an independent than
you could have on a major.
BRIAN: Like Kid Rock.
JIM: That's a great example. Kid
Rock is this rapper from Detroit who's been putting
out records since 1985 when he was 14 years old or something.
Over the years, he has built up a loyal following in
the upper-Midwest where he draws 1000-1500 people every
time he plays, he has a record company with 40 college
reps all over the country selling his records and his
merchandise, and his business is making a ton of money.
He's had record deals before -- which didn't work out
-- but he kept his stature up, he's probably making
more money than he did when he was signed, and he just
signed with Atlantic. But he's going to keep his company
going, and he's probably making better music now than
he ever did before. After all these years, it might
finally be the time for him to bust out. And he deserves
the respect for doing it all on his own.
TOP
|